Doe v. United States Department of Justice et al
| Jane Doe |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice and United States of America |
| 5:2007cv00267 |
| August 24, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Fayette |
| Jennifer B Coffman |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Doe's 78 MOTION for Jury Trial is GRANTED, and the court will therefore impanel an advisory jury at trial. Signed by Judge Jennifer B Coffman on August 31, 2010. (AWD) cc: COR,JC
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that dfts' 17 MOTION For Leave To File Under Seal And, MOTION For Relief From 12 Order Dated September 28, 2007, is granted; dft permitted to file under seal proposed motion to dismiss or, in the a lternative, for summary judgment, inc. exhibits, & also any reply in support of said motion, inc. exhibits; dfts are also granted leave from the court's 12 order dated 9/28/07, to extent that members of the Clerk's Office of either the EDKY or the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals shall not be required to sign the acknowledgement prescribed by that order so long as tendered sealed documents are identified appropriately. Signed by Judge Jennifer B. Coffman on 2/5/08. (MWZ)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
