Fiveash v. Commerce Lexington, Inc. et al
| Sharon Fiveash |
| Commerce Lexington, Inc., Robert Quick, Humana Medical Plan, Inc. and Delta Dental of Kentucky, Inc. |
| 5:2008cv00028 |
| January 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Fayette |
| Joseph M. Hood |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Plaintiff's 22 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (2) Plaintiff shall be awarded attorneys' fees in the amount of $10,366.49. (3) Plaintiff shall be awarded costs in the amount of $350. (4) Plaintiff shall be awarded additional statutory penalties in the amount of $200. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on April 15, 2009.(AWD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) 14 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Sharon Fiveash filed by Sharon Fiveash is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; (2) Plaintiff's claim for penalties is GRANTED in the amount of $2000; (3) Plaintiff's motion as to all other claims is DENIED; (4) Plaintiff is awarded attorneys' fees and costs; (5) Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE as why remaining claims should not be dismissed by 2/24/09. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 2/10/2009.(AWD)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
