Beechglen Farms et al v. Plummer
Plaintiff: Beechglen Farms and John Hales
Defendant: Spencer D. Plummer, III
Case Number: 5:2008cv00060
Filed: February 5, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Joseph M. Hood
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) MOTION for Protective Order by GeoStar Corporation is DENIED; (2) West Hills Plts shall bear reasonable cost to GeoStar of copying & delivering data to counsel for West Hills; (3) By 2/12/2009, GeoStar shall provide We st Hills good-faith estimate of reasonable cost of copying & delivering data; (4) By 2/17/2009, West Hills shall notify GeoStar whether it wishes GeoStar to proceed to produce data based on estimate; (5) GeoStar shall PRODUCE requested financial data in native format to West Hills by 3/4/2009; (6) GeoStar shall be relieved of obligation to timely produce data only if West Hills advise GeoStar they do not wish to proceed w/ production as set forth above. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B Todd on 2/2/2009.(STB)cc: COR
December 29, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Clerk shall file Mtn for Reconsideration in 08-17, 08-18, 08-60, 08-74, 08-79, 08-104, 08-373, 08-418, 08-487 & 08-496; (2) 26 MOTION for Reconsideration re 24 Order, is DENIED. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 12/23/2008.(STB)cc: COR
October 28, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: (1) Request by Plts Goyak to strike certain proposed orders is DENIED; (2) Plt West Hills' Mtn for Status Conference is DENIED AS MOOT; (3) Geostar's Mtn for Protective Order is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED AS MO OT IN PART; (4) depos of Dfts Ferguson, Parrott & Robinson not scheduled prior to 12/1/2008; (5) Dfts Ferguson, Parrott & Robinson not required to respond to interrogatories or requests for admission prior to 12/1/2008, but shall serve responses to all timely served discovery requests by 12/1/2008; (6) that all other permitted discovery shall proceed unless otherwise made subject of an order of this Court. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 10/28/2008.(STB)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beechglen Farms et al v. Plummer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beechglen Farms
Represented By: Brent O. Hatch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Hales
Represented By: Brent O. Hatch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spencer D. Plummer, III
Represented By: Marc T. Rasich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?