Scott v. Garrard County Fiscal Court et al
| Donna Scott |
| Garrard County Fiscal Court, Fred Simpson and John Wilson |
| 5:2008cv00273 |
| June 13, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Garrard |
| Joseph M. Hood |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) pltf's Fourth Amendment claim for seizure of her gate is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (2) pltf's claims arising under state law are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Additionally, Court will recapitulate its previ ous dispositions of pltf's other claims: (1) on 1/20/2012, pltf's Due Process & Takings claims, brought under the Fifth & Fourteenth Amendments, were dismissed without prejudice; (2) on 2/6/2012 pltf's Equal Protection claim, brought under the Fourteenth Amendment, was dismissed without prejudice; (3) on 2/24/2012, pltf's claim for the seizure of Lanham Lane, brought under the Fourth Amendment, was dismissed with prejudice; separate judgment will issue. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 04/04/2012.(RJD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) pltf's Fourth Amendment claim for the seizure of Lanham Lane is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (2) dfts' 46 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is DENIED, in accordance w/Court's MOO of 5/6/2011; ( 3) dfts' 42 MOTION to Withdraw or Amend Responses is GRANTED; (4) pltf's 44 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; (5) pltf shall submit to Court, OOB 3/9/2012, a memorandum, limited to sole issue of reasonableness of dfts' actions w/respect to her gate; (6) dft shall submit its response by 3/23/2012; (7) pltf shall submit reply by 3/30/2012. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 02/24/2012.(RJD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Plt's equal protection claim DISMISSED W/OUT PREJUDICE; (2) Dfts shall file REPLY to Plt's response to Court's Show Cause Order w/in 14 days. Reply limited to sole issue of continued viability of Plt's 4th Amendment claim re seizure of Lanham Lane. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 2/6/2012.(STB)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) pltf's due process & taking claims, brought under the Fifth & Fourteenth Amendments, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; (2) pltf shall Show Cause by 2/3/2012 why her claim for the unreasonable seizure of real property & her equal protection claim should not be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 01/20/2012.(RJD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) that pla shall Show Cause with 14 days why her claims should not be dismissed w/out prejudice; (2) that all briefing of other issues, including the issue of ownership of Lanham Lane & its status as a private or county road, remains STAYED & HELD IN ABEYANCE until dfts' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is resolved. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 5/6/11.(KJR)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: pla's 15 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and dfts' 14 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 03/18/2010. (RJD)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
