McCarty v. Dewalt
Petitioner: Harold Dean McCarty
Respondent: Stephen Dewalt
Case Number: 5:2008cv00433
Filed: October 23, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Joseph M. Hood
Presiding Judge: Pro Se
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 JUDGMENT: (1) petition filed by Harold Dean McCarty against Warden Stephen Dewalt as respondent 2 is DENIED, & Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the respondent; (2)Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 01/29/2009.(RJD)cc: COR,PET
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCarty v. Dewalt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Harold Dean McCarty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Stephen Dewalt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?