Himes et al v. USA
Plaintiff: Josh Himes and Mary Himes
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 5:2008cv00475
Filed: November 19, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Tort Product Liability Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: Karl S. Forester
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:1346 Tort Claim

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 OPINION & ORDER: (1) Dfts' 8 Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judgment GRANTED; (2) judgment in favor of dfts will be entered contemporaneously herewith. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 2/3/2010. (STB)cc: COR
September 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 25 OPINION & ORDER: (1) IT IS ORDERED that US motion to quash and for protective order 19 is GRANTED and tendered Protective Order will be entered contemporaneously w/this Opinion & Order; (2) Pla's motion for extension of time 21 is GRANTED a nd for period of SIXTY DAYS FROM ENTRY OF THIS ORDER, parties may engage in LIMITED DISCOVERY; (3) WITHIN 15 DAYS after 60 day discovery period, parties SHALL FILE contemporaneous briefs on this issue; (4) pla's motion for hearing 23 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 09/29/09.(GLD)cc: COR
August 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 OPINION & ORDER: (1) Plts' 13 MOTION for Hearing is DENIED; (2) Dfts' 8 MOTION to Dismiss based on exhaustion of administrative remedies is DENIED; (3) Dfts' 8 MOTION to Dismiss based on exclusive remedy provisions of Kentucky W orkers Compensation Act is PASSED pending further discovery; (4) LIMITED DISCOVERY FOR SIXTY DAYS FROM ENTRY OF THIS ORDER only on issue of whether work performed by Himes was 'regular or recurrent' part of work of Blue Grass Army Depot; (5) parties FILE contemporaneous briefs on issue WITHIN 15 DAYS of conclusion of discovery; no further briefing allowed. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 8/28/2009. (STB)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Himes et al v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Josh Himes
Represented By: James T. Gilbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Himes
Represented By: James T. Gilbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?