Robinson v. SSA
Plaintiff: Jordache Robinson
Defendant: SSA
Case Number: 5:2008cv00482
Filed: November 21, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Karl S. Forester
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 OPINION & ORDER: 1) 10 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED: 2) 11 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; 3) Decision of Commissioner is AFFIRMED pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 USC 405(g); 4) Judgment will be entered w/ this Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 12/21/2009.(SCD)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robinson v. SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jordache Robinson
Represented By: Theodore Berry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?