Hernandez v. Dewalt
Defendant: Stephen Dewalt
Petitioner: Andres Hernandez
Case Number: 5:2009cv00003
Filed: January 5, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Karl S. Forester
Presiding Judge: Pro Se
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER - (1)Hernandez's petition for a writ of habeas corpus 2 is DENIED; (2)The Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 01/16/2009.(RJD)cc: COR,PETITIONER Modified by adding party to cc line on 1/21/2009 (RJD).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hernandez v. Dewalt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Andres Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen Dewalt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?