Payne v. Meko
Petitioner: William Payne
Respondent: Joseph Meko
Case Number: 5:2009cv00065
Filed: February 25, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: Karl S. Forester
Presiding Judge: James B Todd
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER: (1) Magistrate Judge's 19 Report and Recommendations ADOPTED as opinion of Court; (2) Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (3) Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE; (4) JGM will be entered. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 10/18/2011.(STB)cc: COR, Petitioner
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Payne v. Meko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Joseph Meko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?