Amaechi v. University of Kentucky (UK) et al
Christopher N. Amaechi |
University of Kentucky (UK), The, Jacqeline O. Hager, Donald Witt and Board of Trustees for the University of Kentucky, The |
5:2009cv00118 |
April 8, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Fayette |
Karl S. Forester |
Pro Se |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 OPINION & ORDER: 1) 82 Motion for Relief is DENIED. 2) 84 Motion to Alter or Amend is GRANTED to the extent that the Court's Opinion & Order of 4/19/2010 is AMENDED to reflect that Amaechi's Title VI claims are dismissed because Amaechi failed to come forward w/ any evidence. 3) 81 Motion to Strike is DENIED as moot. 4) Amended Judgment consistent w/ this Opinion & Order will be entered. 5) Matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket. 6) Amended Judgment is FINAL and APPEALABLE and no just cause for delay exists. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 6/21/2010. (SCD)cc: COR,6CCA |
Filing 79 OPINION & ORDER: GRANTING dft's 72 MOTION for Summary Judgment; (2) DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE pla's federal claims; (3) DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE pla's state law claims; (4) judgment will be entered in favor of dfts; (5) DENYING pla's 73 motion to suppress irregularities in depo; (6) the pretrial conf of 5/20/10 & jury trial of 6/22/10 is CANCELLED. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 4/19/10.(KJR)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.