Crestwood Farm Bloodstock, LLC v. Everest Stables, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Crestwood Farm Bloodstock, LLC
Defendant: Everest Stables, Inc. and Jeffrey L. Nielsen
Case Number: 5:2009cv00317
Filed: September 28, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Joseph M. Hood
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 236 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Nielsen's 213 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. (2) Counts I, II, III, IV and V in Crestwood's Second Amended Complaint will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot. (3) A Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this and the Court's previous Order. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on March 29, 2013.(AWD) cc: COR
March 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 204 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 1) 152 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2) 154 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. 3) 105 Third Amended Complaint is DISMISSED. 4) Crestwood's claim in Count VI of its Second Amended Compla int for breach of contract is granted as a matter of law and Crestwood is entitled to keep the disputed $219,513.89 plus interest. 5) Court will schedule a telephonic status conference at a mutually convenient time. Parties should be prepared to discuss whether they wish to proceed w any remaining claims. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 3/30/2012. (SCD)cc: COR
June 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: (1) Everest's 31 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Relief is DENIED; (2) parties are directed to participate in TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE set for 8/3/2010 at 12:45 PM in LEXINGTON before Judge Karen K. Caldwell to revise the existing Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 06/24/2010 (RJD)cc: COR,D
January 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 OPINION & ORDER: (1) Defendant's 9 MOTION to Stay the proceedings is GRANTED and these proceedings are STAYED until resolution of the motions pending in the Minnesota action. (2) Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss is DENIED without prejudice. (3) Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on January 7, 2010. (AWD) cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crestwood Farm Bloodstock, LLC v. Everest Stables, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crestwood Farm Bloodstock, LLC
Represented By: Richard A. Getty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Everest Stables, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey L. Nielsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?