Vesseghi v. United States of America et al
Plaintiff: Ben Vesseghi
Defendant: United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FMC-Lexington and Deborah A. Hickey
Case Number: 5:2009cv00386
Filed: November 30, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Karl S. Forester
Presiding Judge: Pro Se
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Court ORDERS (1) Clerk directed to amend/correct docket sheet to reflect correct spelling of Plt's surname; (2) 10 MOTION to Leave and Supercede Any and All Previous Motions, and to Vacate All Charges Here in, and to Restore Plaintiff's Record is DENIED; (3) Pursuant to Court's construction of 10 MOTION to Leave and Supercede Any and All Previous Motions, and to Vacate All Charges Herein, and to Restore Plaintiff's Record as a P etitition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Clerk is directed to extract this motion from record and designate as a new habeas petition; (4) 12 MOTION to Reactivate Pending Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 is DENIED AS MOOT; (5) within 30 d ays of date of this Order Vasseghi directed to pay $5.00 filing fee for habeas corpus petition, failure to pay filing fee may result in dismissal; (5) upon payment of filing fee, matter will be submitted for required screening. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 03/14/2012.(DAK)cc: COR, PSO, Pro Se Ptf (via U.S. Mail)
January 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Plaintiff Ben Vesseghi's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (2) Judgment shall be entered contemporaneously with the Memorandum Opinion and Order in favor of the named Defendants. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on January 6, 2010. (AWD) cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vesseghi v. United States of America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ben Vesseghi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FMC-Lexington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deborah A. Hickey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?