TS et al v. Doe et al
| TS and T.S. |
| John Doe, Jane Doe, Jay Ronald Haws and A. Hasan Davis |
| 5:2010cv00217 |
| June 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Breathitt |
| Karl S. Forester |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Plas' 92 Motion for Fees is DENIED. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on June 27, 2014. (AWD) cc: COR
|
|
Filing
91
OPINION & ORDER: (1) Plas' federal claims against the Dfts are hereby DISMISSED based on qualified immunity. (2) Plas' state law claims against the Dfts are REMANDED to Breathitt Circuit Court. (3) Clerk shall mail a certified copy of this Order to the Breathitt Circuit Court Clerk. (4) This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell for Judge Karl S. Forester on March 26, 2014. (AWD) cc: COR,certified copy to Breathitt Circuit Court Clerk
|
|
Filing
84
OPINION & ORDER: (1) Defendants' 73 Motion for Leave to File an Additional Exhibit to Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to FILE the tendered exhibit. (2) Defendants' 27 and 67 Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and the Plaintiffs' 34 and 72 Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: (a) Plaintiffs' constitutional claims based on the 14th Amendment and deliberate indifference to the Plaintiffs' constitutional rights are DISMISSED as to all Defendants; (b) Plaintiffs' constitutional claims based on the 4th Amendment as to Defendants Gabbard, Harvey, Haws, Davis, Sewell, Drake and Voyles R EMAIN PENDING; (c) Plaintiffs' state law claims for false imprisonment, negligence and grossly negligent infliction of emotional distress against Defendants Gabbard and Harvey are DISMISSED; (d) Plaintiffs' state law claims based on invasio n of privacy and assault against Defendants Gabbard and Harvey REMAIN PENDING; (e) Plaintiffs' claim for Declaratory Judgment is DISMISSED; and (f) Plaintiffs' claim for Injunctive Relief is PASSED. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on June 14, 2012.(AWD) cc: COR
|
|
Filing
74
OPINION & ORDER: (1) Dfts' 73 Motion for Leave to file an add'l exhibit to supplemental motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to FILE the tendered exhibit. (2) Dfts' 27 and 67 Motions for Summary Judg ment are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and the Plaintiffs' 34 and 72 Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: (a) Plaintiffs' constitutional claims based on the 14th Amendment and deliberate indifference to the Plaintiffs' constitutional rights are DISMISSED as to all Dfts; (b) the Plaintiffs' constitutional claims based on the 4th Amendment against Dfts Haws, Davis, Sewell, Drake and Voyles are DISMISSED, based on qualified im munity; (c) Plaintiffs' constitutional claims based on the 4th Amendment as to Dfts Gabbard and Harvey REMAIN PENDING; (d) Plaintiffs' state law claims for false imprisonment, negligence, and grossly negligent infliction of emotional distre ss are DISMISSED; (e) Plaintiffs' state law claims based on invasion of privacy and assault against Dfts Gabbard and Harvey REMAIN PENDING; (f) Plaintiffs' claim for Declaratory Judgment is DISMISSED; and (g) Plaintiffs' claim for Injunctive Relief is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on May 9, 2012. (AWD) cc: COR
|
|
Filing
69
OPINION & ORDER: (1) Plaintiffs' 63 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery is DENIED. (2) Plaintiffs' 63 Motion for an extension of time to supplement pending dispositive motions is GRANTED only to the extent that the parties may file any necessary amendments to their respective pending summary judgment motions NO LATER THAN APRIL 27, 2012. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on April 17, 2012. (AWD) cc: COR
|
|
Filing
18
OPINION & ORDER: GRANTING IN PART & DENYING IN PART dft Gabbard & Harvey's 11 MOTION to Dismiss; the motion to dismiss is GRANTED for (1) all claims against Gabbard & Harvey in their official capacity; (2) pla's claims for money damages under the KY Constitution; & (3) pla's claim of intentional inflection of emotion distress; all other claims are DENIED. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 10/6/10.(KJR)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
