Espinosa v. Louisville Metro Government et al
Manuel E. Espinosa |
Louisville Metro Government and Commonwealth of Kentucky |
5:2010cv00354 |
October 8, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Lexington Office |
Fayette |
Jennifer B Coffman |
Pro Se |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the motions for reconsideration 14 19 are DENIED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining motions 10 11 28 are DENIED AS MOOT; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as all claims against both dfts have been dismissed, that this action is DISMISSED AND STRICKEN from active docket. A judgment shall be filed separately. Signed by Judge Jennifer B Coffman on 7/31/2011.(GLD)cc: COR, Manuel E. Epinosa, pro se |
Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the dft's 16 MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Jennifer B Coffman on 6/10/2011.(GLD)cc: COR, Mailed to pro se plaintiff |
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Pla's Motion for removal 3 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Jennifer B Coffman on 2/28/2011.(GLD)cc: COR AND Manuel E. Espinosa, pro se |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Dft Louisville Metro Government's Motion to Dismiss 5 is GRANTED; Commonwealth's 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to file answer is GRANTED and answer due 2/28/2011. Signed by Judge Jennifer B Coffman on 2/10/2011.(GLD)cc: COR and pro se plaintiff |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.