Green v. Sandy et al
| Ashley Green |
| Eastern Kentucky University, Board of Regents, Eastern Kentucky University, Incorporated, Eastern Kentucky University, Department of Athletics, Mark Sandy and Lindsay Basalyga |
| 5:2010cv00367 |
| October 22, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Madison |
| Joseph M. Hood |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) GRANTING pla's 39 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint; (2) the clerk shall file pla's 35 tendered First Amended Complaint; (3) DENYING AS MOOT dft's 11 & 12 Motions to Dismiss; (4) dft's 41 response to pla's 39 Motion for leave to file First Amended Complaint is CONSTRUED as a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint and is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 10/3/11.(KJR)cc: COR
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Clerk shall designate Plaintiff's 35 First Amended Complaint as "tendered." (2) Plaintiff shall have 5 DAYS to obtain and submit written consent from Dfts to file a First Amended Complaint or request leave of Court to file the First Amended Complaint by motion. If Dfts object to Plaintiff's motion, they shall have 10 DAYS to make their response and state their objections. Plaintiff shall have 5 DAYS to file any reply in further support. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on February 1, 2011. (AWD) cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.