Goodrich v. USA
Plaintiff: Calvin Goodrich
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 5:2010cv00418
Filed: December 13, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Jennifer B Coffman
Presiding Judge: Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Court ORDERS (1) 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; (2) action is DISMISSED from active docket; and (3) Judgment will be entered contemporaneously in favor of Respondent and Goodrich's current custodian, Howard L. Hufford, Warden of FCI-Schuylkill. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 05/08/2012.(DAK)cc: COR,Pro Se Pla (via U.S. Mail)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Goodrich v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Calvin Goodrich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?