USA v. Martin
Petitioner: USA
Respondent: Scott Martin
Case Number: 5:2010mc00292
Filed: August 20, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Karl S. Forester
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: (1) Mag Judge's 8 Report and Recommendations is ADOPTED & INCORPORATED by reference; (2) USAs' 1 Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Summons is GRANTED; (3) Martin shall appear at agreed date & time before Revenue Officer to re spond in full to summons previously served; failure to abide by order to appear could subject Martin to potential penalties, including contempt of court; (4) Judgment will be entered contemporaneously w/this opinion & order in favor of USA. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 11/08/2010. (RJD)cc: COR,RESPONDENT
October 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION re 1 PETITION to Enforce IRS Summons - Court recommends that District Judge issue an order enforcing the IRS summons at issue in this action; IRS has established its right to enforcement, & respondent has failed to show any cause in avoidance of such relief; District Judge should order respondent appear at particular date & time before Revenue Officer Linda Kennedy to respond in full to summonses previously served; Court further should warn, & Martin must take notice, t hat failure to abide by the order to appear could subject Martin to potential penalties, including contempt of court; Clerk shall serve this Order on all parties, & specifically serve respondent @ 690 Gingermill Ln, Lex, KY; Court directs partie s for appeal rights & mechanics concerning this Recommended Disposition; w/in 14 days after being served w/copy of this decision, any party may serve & file specific written objections to any or all findings or recommendations for determination, de n ovo, by District Court; failure to make timely objections consistent w/statute & rule may result in waiver of further appeal or review by District Court & Court of Appeals. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert E. Wier on 10/6/2010.(RJD)cc: COR,RESPONDENT
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: USA
Represented By: David E. Middleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?