Cramer v. Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Joseph H. Cramer
Defendant: The Committee of the Appalachian Regional Healthcare Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc. and The Appalachian Regional Healthcare Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
Case Number: 5:2011cv00049
Filed: January 28, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Karen K. Caldwell
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's 27 MOTION for Judgment Reversing Administrative Decision is DENIED with regard to both his claim for benefits under ERISA § 502(a)(1)(B) and his claim for equitable estoppel. The Court further ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on September 27, 2013. (MWZ) cc: COR
October 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: the court determines SERP is a top hat plan. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 10/29/12.(KJR)cc: COR
March 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER (1) 14 MOTION for Discovery is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART: (a) Motion is GRANTED to extent Plt is entitled to limited discovery re Dft's conflict of interest and alleged bias; (b) Motion is GRANTED to extent Plt is entitled to limited discovery re SERP's potential top hat status; and (c) Motion is DENIED as to remainder of discovery requests; (2) Parties shall file written proposal for discovery and filing deadlines NLT 20 days from entry of this Order.Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 03/23/2012.(DAK)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cramer v. Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Committee of the Appalachian Regional Healthcare Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
Represented By: Keith Moorman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc.
Represented By: Keith Moorman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Appalachian Regional Healthcare Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
Represented By: Keith Moorman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph H. Cramer
Represented By: J. Whitney Wallingford
Represented By: Brian A. Ritchie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?