Haffey et al v. Gentry Mechanical Systems, Inc. et al
| Shane M. Haffey |
| State Farm Bank, F.S.B., Deutsche Bank National Trust Company Americas, Gentry Mechanical Systems, Inc. and Patricia Kelleher |
| 5:2011cv00188 |
| June 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Fayette |
| Jennifer B Coffman |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: It is ordered that Haffey's 47 Motion to Vacate orders in relation to the automatic stay is DENIED. Signed by Judge Jennifer B Coffman on 12/20/2012. (SCD)cc: COR,Haffey(via US Mail)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: DENYING Haffey's 33 MOTION to Alter or Amend the 32 Judgment on the Pleadings by Shane M. Haffey(as a Relator Qui Tam )Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Jennifer B Coffman on 10/3/12.(KJR)cc: COR,Haffey
|
|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: that Deutsche Bank's motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED; that Shane Haffey's motion for extension of time to respond to the motion is GRANTED & the clerk shall docket the response in Case No. 08-459; that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE & STRICKEN from the record. Signed by Judge Jennifer B Coffman on 3/2/12.(KJR)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
