Yisra'el v. United States Department of Justice

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Kentucky Eastern District Yisra'el v. United States Department of Justice

Yisra'el v. United States Department of Justice

Petitioner:	Meged Dawvid Yisra'el
Respondent:	United States Department of Justice
Case Number:	5:2011cv00289
Filed:	September 9, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office:	Lexington Office
County:	Fayette
Presiding Judge:	PSO
Presiding Judge:	Karl S. Forester
Nature of Suit:	Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1361
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 4, 2012	Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) DENYING petitioner's 6 objection/motion for reconsideration; (2) DENYING AS MOOT petitioner's 7 MOTION; (3) the Opinion & order and Judgment will not be set aside & this proceeding remains DISMISSED; (4) clerk shall transmit a copy of this Memorandum Opinion & Order to the 6CCA referencing Case No. 12-5289. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 4/4/12.(KJR)cc: COR,6CCA, petitioner (US Mail)
September 23, 2011	Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) DENYING petitioner's 1 emergency petition for writ of mandamus; (2) if petitioner intends to file a future civil rights action asserting 8th amendment medical claims or conditions of his confinement at FMC he mu st fully exhaust such claims through the BOP's administrative remedy procedures & either pay $350 ff or seek permission to proceed IFP; (3) matter is DISMISSED & STRICKEN from the docket; (4) judgment in favor of respondent will be entered. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 9/23/11.(KJR)cc: COR,petitioner (US Mail)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 4, 2012

Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) DENYING petitioner's 6 objection/motion for reconsideration; (2) DENYING AS MOOT petitioner's 7 MOTION; (3) the Opinion & order and Judgment will not be set aside & this proceeding remains DISMISSED; (4) clerk shall transmit a copy of this Memorandum Opinion & Order to the 6CCA referencing Case No. 12-5289. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 4/4/12.(KJR)cc: COR,6CCA, petitioner (US Mail)

September 23, 2011

Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) DENYING petitioner's 1 emergency petition for writ of mandamus; (2) if petitioner intends to file a future civil rights action asserting 8th amendment medical claims or conditions of his confinement at FMC he mu st fully exhaust such claims through the BOP's administrative remedy procedures & either pay $350 ff or seek permission to proceed IFP; (3) matter is DISMISSED & STRICKEN from the docket; (4) judgment in favor of respondent will be entered. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 9/23/11.(KJR)cc: COR,petitioner (US Mail)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yisra'el v. United States Department of Justice
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States Department of Justice
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Meged Dawvid Yisra'el
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?