VanWinkle, Jr. v. Life Insurance Company of North America

Defendant: Life Insurance Company of North America
Plaintiff: Boyd VanWinkle, Jr.
Case Number: 5:2012cv00253
Filed: August 13, 2012
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Office: Lexington Office
County: Mercer
Presiding Judge: Karl S. Forester
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 8, 2013 13 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION & ORDER: (1) 11 Motion for de novo review DENIED; (2) 11 Motion to Strike portions of administrative record DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; (3) Court will review matter under arbitrary and capricious standard of review. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 5/8/2013. (STB)cc: COR

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: VanWinkle, Jr. v. Life Insurance Company of North America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Life Insurance Company of North America
Represented By: Walter M. Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Boyd VanWinkle, Jr.
Represented By: Philip G. Fairbanks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.