McIntosh v. E-backgroundchecks.com, Inc. et al
| Billy Joe McIntosh |
| John Doe and E-backgroundchecks.com, Inc. |
| 5:2012cv00310 |
| October 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Fayette |
| Danny C. Reeves |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that Dft Genuine Data Service's 37 MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED. All claims asserted by Pla Billy Joe McIntosh in the First Amended Complaint against Dft Genuine Data Services are DISMISSED, with prejudice. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on September 12, 2013. (MWZ) cc: COR
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) 12 Partial MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED re Counts III, IV, V, VI and VII. (2) 26 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint is DENIED regarding Counts III, IV, V, VI and VII. Motion is GRANTED re the remaining counts. (3) Genuine Data Services, LLC will be SUBSTITUTED as the party dft in the place of the Unknown Dft. (4) Pla is given 10 days to file an Amended Complaint in compliance with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/20/2013.(SCD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: It is ordered that Dft E-backgroundchecks.com's 13 MOTION to Change Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1404 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/11/2013.(SCD)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
