Noble v. Adams et al
| Arlie Noble |
| Richard Adams, Janet Kelso, Harvey Pelfrey, Keith Combs, Varian Rowland, Ivan Fletcher, Jason Dunaway and John Doe |
| 5:2012cv00342 |
| November 13, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Lee |
| PSO |
| Danny C. Reeves |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Three Forks Regional Jail Authority; Richard Adams; Janet/Janice Kelso, individually and in her official capacity; Harvey Pelfrey, individually and in his official capacity; Keith Combs, individually and in his official capacity; Varian Rowland, individually and in his official capacity; Ivan Fletcher, individually and in his official capacity; and Jason Dunaway, individually and in his official capacity (Re cord No. 17 ) is GRANTED. 2. The claims asserted by Plaintiff Noble Adams against the defendants are DISMISSED, with prejudice. Further, the claims asserted against "John Doe." unknown defendant, individually and as an employee of Three Forks Regional Jail, are DISMISSED under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 3. All claims having been resolved, this action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 4. A final and appealable Judgment shall be entered this date. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 2/10/2014.(AKR)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.