Dunn v. Corning Incorporated

Dunn v. Corning Incorporated

Plaintiff:	Steve Dunn
Defendant:	Corning Incorporated
Case Number:	5:2013cv00008
Filed:	January 7, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office:	Lexington Office
County:	Mercer
Presiding Judge:	Joseph M. Hood
Nature of Suit:	P.I.: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 22, 2013	Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) GRANTING dft's 25 MOTION for Summary Judgment; (2) pla's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 11/22/13.(KJR)cc: COR,REW,JC,D
September 18, 2013	Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Dft's 25 Motion for Summary Judgment is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. (2) Parties shall have an add'l 30 days to conduct discovery on limited issue of the regularity or recurring nature of running electrical pow er within Dft's business. (3) Dft shall have 14 days after the time for add'l discovery in which to supplement its 25 Motion for Summary Judgment. (4) Pla shall have 14 days from the date Dft supplements its Motion to supplement his Response. Clerk shall resubmit this motion at the conclusion of the add'l briefing period. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on September 18, 2013. (AWD) cc: COR

Date Filed

Document Text

November 22, 2013

Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) GRANTING dft's 25 MOTION for Summary Judgment; (2) pla's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 11/22/13.(KJR)cc: COR,REW,JC,D

September 18, 2013

Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Dft's 25 Motion for Summary Judgment is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. (2) Parties shall have an add'l 30 days to conduct discovery on limited issue of the regularity or recurring nature of running electrical pow er within Dft's business. (3) Dft shall have 14 days after the time for add'l discovery in which to supplement its 25 Motion for Summary Judgment. (4) Pla shall have 14 days from the date Dft supplements its Motion to supplement his Response. Clerk shall resubmit this motion at the conclusion of the add'l briefing period. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on September 18, 2013. (AWD) cc: COR

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dunn v. Corning Incorporated
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steve Dunn
Represented By:	Kenneth L. Sales
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Corning Incorporated
Represented By:	George J. Miller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?