Kentucky CVS Pharmacy, LLC v. McKinney et al
Kentucky CVS Pharmacy, LLC |
Louise Wagers McCord Trust B, Spencer Drug, LLC, John McKinney and Mary Ann McKinney |
John McKinney and Mary Ann McKinney |
Kentucky CVS Pharmacy, LLC |
5:2013cv00025 |
January 25, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Lexington Office |
Madison |
Karl S. Forester |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 OPINION AND ORDER: Spencer Drug's 34 Motion to Dismiss amended complaint is GRANTED TO THE EXTENT that CVS's claim for unfair competition (Count VIII) is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 9/26/2013. (STC)cc: COR |
Filing 72 OPINION AND ORDER: Plt's 14 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 9/20/2013. (STC)cc: COR |
Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER: (1) CVS' 15 Motion to Expedite discovery GRANTED; (2) parties shall serve requests for production of documents w/in 7 days; (3) Responses to those requests shall be due w/in 14 days after service; (4) all party depositions shall be completed w/in 60 days. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 4/16/2013. (STB)cc: COR |
Filing 37 OPINION AND ORDER: Dft Spencer Drug's 11 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; Defendant Trust's 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is DENIED. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 4/15/2013. (STB)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.