Reid v. SSA

Plaintiff: William Reid
Defendant: SSA
Case Number: 5:2013cv00036
Filed: February 8, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: Amul R. Thapar
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2013 Filing 11 ORDER: (1) Pla's 9 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. (2) Dft's 10 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. (3) JUDGMENT in favor of the Dft will be entered contemporaneously with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. (4) Clerk shall STRIKE this case from the Court's active docket. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on June 25, 2013. (AWD) cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reid v. SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Reid
Represented By: Roger Donald Riggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SSA
Represented By: John S. Osborn, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?