Vidal v. Lexington-Fayette County Urban Government et al
| Richard A. Vidal |
| Lexington Police Department, Lexington-Fayette County Urban Government, R. Kornrumpf and John Does |
| 5:2013cv00117 |
| April 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Fayette |
| Danny C. Reeves |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: (1) Dfts' 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, in part, with respect to the following claims and parties: (a) Counts I, II, III and IV as they pertain to Dft LFUCG and Dft R. Kornrupmf, in his official capacity; (b) All claims brought under the Fifth or Fourteenth Amendment against Dft Kornrumpf, in his individual capacity, in Counts I, II, III, and IV; (c) Count V, in its entirety ; (d) Count VI, in its entirety; (e) Count VII, in its entirety; (f) Count VIII, in its entirety; (g) Count IX, in its entirety; (h) Count X, in its entirety; (i) Count XI, in its entirety; (j) Count XII, in its entirety; and (k) Count XIII, in its e ntirety. (2) Dft's 12 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to the remaining claims. (3) All claims against Dft LFUCG having been resolved, it is DISMISSED as a party to this action. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on September 8, 2014. (AWD) cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
