Hatfield et al v. Cabinet for Health & Family Services (Kentucky) et al
| M.E. and Laura Hatfield |
| Bruce Linder, Audrey Haynes, Elouise Bailey, Cabinet for Health & Family Services (Kentucky), Teresa James, Mona Womack and Ravonda Russell |
| 5:2013cv00222 |
| July 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Estill |
| PSO |
| Karen K. Caldwell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: (1) Hatfield's 13 Motion to Re-Submit Response is DENIED. (2) Clerk shall STRIKE Hatfield's 13 Motion to Re-Submit Response and 12 Reply Memorandum from the record. (3) Pla's 10 Motion to Compel E vidence and 15 Motion for Discovery are DENIED AS MOOT. (4) Dfts' 17 Motion to Stay is DENIED AS MOOT. (5) Dfts' 6 Motion to Dismiss Complaint is GRANTED. (6) Pla's federal civil rights claims 5 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; P la's claims under Kentucky's Open Records Act 5 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (7) Court will enter a judgment contemporaneously with this Order. (8) This matter is STRICKEN from the active docket. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on March 25, 2014. (AWD) cc: COR,Pla via US Mail -- Modified cc on 3/25/2014. (AWD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
