Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. v. Bickley et al
| Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. |
| Shane Bickley and Michael Robinson |
| 5:2013cv00366 |
| October 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Fayette |
| Karl S. Forester |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
202
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Defendants Shane Bickley and Michael Robinson's Motion for Summary Judgment 120 is hereby GRANTED as to Count I (breach of the non-solicitation provision), Count III (breach of the non-disclosure provision), Cou nt IV (breach of the noncompetition provision) and Count V (tortious interference with business relations) and DENIED as to Count II (breach of the return of property provision) and Count VI (violation of the Kentucky Uniform Trade Secrets Act); 2. D efendant Delta T Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment 121 is hereby GRANTED as to Count VII (tortious interference with contractual relations); 3. Delta T Corporation is hereby DISMISSED as a party to this action, as the Court has adjudic ated the sole claim against it; and 4. The remaining parties to this action shall file a Joint Notice of available pretrial and trial dates within twenty (20) days of the date of entry of this Order. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 3/24/2016.(LC)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
