Hanson v. Madison County Detention Center et al
| John Hanson |
| Madison County Detention Center, Madison County, Kentucky, Doug Thomas, Timothy Craig Whitaker, Brian Staggs, Joshua Napier and Unknown Deputy Jailer |
| 5:2014cv00099 |
| March 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Madison |
| Danny C. Reeves |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
178
OPINION & ORDER: The Court GRANTS the Madison County Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Sur-reply 174 , DENIES Hanson's Motion for Leave to Supplement the Record 172 , and DENIES Hanson's Motion to Amend the Judgment 164 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert E. Wier on 7/17/2017.(KM)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
160
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Court fully GRANTS Motion for Summary Judgment by the Madison County Defendants 127 and DENIES Motion for Summary Judgment by John Hanson 130 . Court DENIES AS MOOT Motion for Default Judgment by Madison County Defend ants 125 and Motion for Summary Judgment by Jake Adkins 129 . Court further DENIES AS MOOT Motion to Exclude Report & Testimony of Plaintiff's Proposed expert witness by Madison County Defendants 126 & MOTION to Exclude the testimony and report of Defendant's Proposed Expert Witness, Rob Miller by John Hanson 131 .. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert E. Wier on 1/23/2017.(KM)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
