McCartt v. Kellogg USA, Inc. et al
| James B. McCartt |
| Kellogg USA, Inc. and Kellogg Sales Company |
| 5:2014cv00318 |
| August 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Fayette |
| Danny C. Reeves |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) 48 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED w respect to Pla's claims of retaliation, violation of the FLSA and KY wage/hour statute, and violation of KY public policy (Counts III through VIII). 2) 48 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED w respect to the remaining claims (Counts I and II). Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 10/14/2015.(SCD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Dfts' 49 Motion in Limine is DENIED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on October 8, 2015. (AWD) cc: COR
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) 38 MOTION to Sanctions is GRANTED. 2) Pla is prohibited from using any docs produced on 6/11/2015 and 6/12/2015. 3) Dfts will be awarded their reasonable expenses, including atty's fees, incurred in filing th is motion. 4) Dfts shall file an affidavit w/in 10 days outlining their reasonable expenses and include any supporting docs. McCartt shall file any objections w/in 5 days. Issue of expenses will stand submitted at that time. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 7/20/2015.(SCD)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
