Lattanzio v. Brunacini et al
Plaintiff: James Lattanzio
Defendant: Mayme M Brunacini and La Mame Kentucky LLC
Case Number: 5:2016cv00171
Filed: May 31, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: Scott
Presiding Judge: Danny C. Reeves
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 126 JUDGMENT: 1) Judgment is entered in favor of Dfts w respect to all claims asserted in the action by Pla. 2) All claims asserted in this action by Pla against the dfts are DISMISSED w prejudice. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 7/13/2018.(SCD)cc: COR,Pro Se Pla(via US Mail)
April 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 112 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: It is ordered that the 110 motion to disqualify and stay is DENIED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 4/18/2018.(SCD)cc: COR,Pro Se Pla(via US Mail)
March 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 106 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) 75 MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED. 2) To the extent the dft's motion seeks a more definite statement (DE 75 ) the requested relief is DENIED without prejudice, as moot. 3) 79 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel is DENIED as moot. 4) Pla's claims against NBC Universal, LLC are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/20/2018.(SCD)cc: COR,Pro Se Pla(via US Mail)
March 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 98 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) 65 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2) Pla's claim for judgment perfecting his lien in Count I is DISMISSED w prejudice. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/6/2018.(SCD)cc: COR,Pro Se Pla(via US Mail)
December 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) 23 MOTION to Dismiss is DENIED. (2) 26 MOTION for leave to file an amended complaint is GRANTED. (3) 30 MOTION for Leave to File a sur-reply is DENIED. (4) 31 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel is DENIED. (5) Action is STAYED pending fully adjudication of the parallel action in Scott County. Parties are directed to file status reports each 60 days while the state court action remains pending and otherwise notify this Court if the state court action is resolved, dismissed or otherwise concluded. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 12/8/2016.(SCD)cc: COR,Pro Se Pla(via US Mail)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lattanzio v. Brunacini et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Lattanzio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayme M Brunacini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: La Mame Kentucky LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?