Seaton v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
| Kendell Seaton |
| United States Department of Agriculture, Tom Fern, Tom Kostelnik, Cheri Gaudineer, Michelle Witt, Allen Hatcher, Jeff Jones and Gene Floyd |
| 5:2016cv00309 |
| August 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Fayette |
| Joseph M. Hood |
| Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
OPINION, ORDER, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: For all these reasons, the Court FINDS in favor of Defendant Sonny Perdue. The Court will enter a separate Judgment consistent with this ruling. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 9/30/2019.(JJ)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
46
OPINION & ORDER: The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the 25 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment by United States Department of Agriculture. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 3/28/2019.(KM)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) GRANTING dfts' 7 MOTION to Dismiss; (2) dfts Tom Fern, Gene Floyd, Cheri Gaudineer, Allen Hatcher, Jeff Jones, Tom Kostelnik, Michelle Witt; (3) dft Sonny Perdue, acting in his official capacity as the Secretary of the US Department of Agriculture, having filed an answer: (a) w/in 21 days parties meet & exchange disclosures; (b) Order for Meeting & Report due within 10 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 8/2/17.(KJR)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
