Bailey v. Aramark Corporation et al
| David Wayne Bailey |
| Aramark Corporation, Randy Ingram, John Dunn, Stephanie Thompson, Denise Burkett, Brenda Beehler, Jennifer Whelan, Christy Jolly, Rooney Ballard, Brad Adams and Mendalyn Cochran |
| 5:2016cv00343 |
| September 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Mercer |
| Joseph M. Hood |
| P SO |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED: 1. That judgment is entered in favor of Defendants; 2. that this action is DISMISSED AND STRICKEN FROM THE ACTIVE DOCKET; 3. that all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT; 4. that all scheduled proceedings and deadlines are CONTINUED GENERALLY; 5. That is Order is FINAL AND APPEALABLE and THERE IS NO JUST CAUSE FOR DELAY. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 6/6/2018.(KM)cc: COR, Pltf via U.S. mail
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that: Plaintiff David Bailey's motion to file an amended complaint 35 is DENIED; 2. Defendant Aramark Correctional Services, LLC's motion to Dismiss 19 is GRANTED & the claims against it are DI SMISSED; 3. Defendant Randy Ingram's motion to dismiss 32 is GRANTED, & the claim against him are DISMISSED; 4. The motion to dismiss the complaint filed by Stephanie Thompson and Jennifer Whelan 25 is GRANTED, & the claims against them are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 9/1/2017.(KM)cc: COR, Plaintiff via U.S. mail
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
