Walter v. Guitar Center Stores, Inc. et al
| Gregory A. Walter |
| Guitar Center Stores, Inc. and Kirk Hamilton |
| 5:2016cv00459 |
| December 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Fayette |
| Joseph M. Hood |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Defendants Guitar Center Stores, Inc. and Kirk Hamilton's Motion for Partial Dismissal 6 is GRANTED as to Count 1 against Dft Hamilton, Counts III & IV against both Dfts and the portion of Count II that purports to state a conspiracy claim against both Dfts; 2. Plaintiff Walter's Motion to for leave to Amend 9 is GRANTED as to Count II against each Dft, as well as Count VI, and DENIED as to proposed Count IV & Count V; 3. Plaintiff Walter shall FILE a full Amended complaint consistent with this Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order within 14 days of entry of this order; 4. Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 16 and 26: (a) Within 21 days from date of this Order, parties by counsel, shall meet to discuss t he nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case, to make or arrange for disclosures and to develop a proposed discovery plan, (b) within 10 days after the meeting the parties shall file a joint status report. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 7/31/2017.(KM)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
