Doe v. Preferred Care Inc. et al
| Jane Doe |
| Reliant Pro Rehab, LLC and Reliant Rehabilitation Holdings, Inc. |
| USA |
| Commonwealth of Kentucky |
| 5:2016cv00478 |
| December 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Powell |
| Joseph M. Hood |
| Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) The Court construes the parties' Joint Stipulation of Dismissal as a Motion; (2) The Stipulation is GRANTED; (3) The following claims made by the United States and Relator Susan Helton against Preferred Care Inc. , Preferred Care, Inc. d/b/a Preferred Care of Delaware, Inc., Preferred Care Partners Management Group, LP, PCPMG, LLC, Kentucky Partners Management, LLC, Stanton Health Facilities, L.P. d/b/a Stanton Health and Rehabilitation Center, and Thomas D. Scott are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (4) All other remaining allegations against the Settling Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to USA and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Relator Helton; (5) The claims on which the United States has neither intervened nor declined to intervene an intervention decision is now MOOT; (6) The Stipulation does not apply to claims asserted against Reliant Pro Rehab, LLC or Reliant Rehabilitation Holdings, Inc. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 8/2/2018.(JJ)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
