Golden Gate National Senior Care, LLC et al v. Brown et al
Golden Gate National Senior Care, LLC, GGNSC Stanford, LLC, GGNSC Administrative Services, LLC, GGNSC Equity Holdings, LLC, GGNSC Equity Holdings II, LLC, Golden Gate Ancillary, LLC, GGNSC Clinical Services, LLC and GPH Stanford, LLC |
Pat Brown and Gary Brown |
5:2017cv00153 |
March 28, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Lexington Office |
Lincoln |
Joseph M. Hood |
Arbitration |
09 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 8 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited consideration of Complaint to Enforce the the Alternative Resolution Agreement and to Compel Defendants to Submit Their Claims to Arbitration 4 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Cite Additional Authority 12 is GRANTED; 4. Defendants are ENJOINED from pursuing their pending state court claims for violations of the rights of long term care residents under KRS § 216.515 and personal injury by means of negligence, medical negligence, and corporate negligence before the Lincoln Circuit Court. Defendant Gary Brown's claim for loss of spousal consortium before the LincolnCircuit Court is not enjoined. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 4/5/2018.(KM)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.