Eversole v. Ballard et al
| Michael Eversole |
| Rodney Ballard, Jourdan and Jennifer Privett |
| 5:2017cv00155 |
| March 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Fayette |
| Danny C. Reeves |
| Candace J. Smith |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER; 1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 37 is ADOPTED and INCOPORATED, by reference. 2. Defendant Privett's motion for summary judgment 33 is GRANTED. Plaintiff Eversole's claims against De fendant Privett in both her individual and official capacities are DISMISSED, with prejudice. 3. A Judgment shall be entered this date. 4. This action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 1/18/2018.(STC)cc: COR,Plt
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM ORDER: 1. Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith 32 is ADOPTED and INCORPORATED by reference. 2. Defendant Rodney Ballard's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 20 is GRANTED. 3. claims assert ed by Plaintiff Michael Eversole against Defendant Rodney Ballard are DISMISSED, with prejudice. 4. The claims asserted by Plaintiff Michael Eversole against Defendant Chase Jourdan are DIMISSED, without prejudice. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 9/6/2017.(STC)cc: COR,Plt
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
