Red Hed Oil, Inc. et al v. The H.T. Hackney Co. et al
||Red Hed Oil, Inc. and Federated Mutual Insurance Company
||The H.T. Hackney Co., Swisher International, Inc., Logic Technology Development, LLC, Spark Industries LLC, R. J. Reynolds Vapor Company, NJoy Inc. and Fontem Ventures B.V.
||April 18, 2017
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
||Joseph M. Hood
|Nature of Suit:
||Property Damage Product Liability
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 29, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) the court construes pla's motion under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) for voluntary dismissal with prejudice as to dft H.T. Hackney Company as a motion under Rule 21; (2) GRANTING 48 Motion; (3) all claims against The H.T. Hackney Co. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (4) the stipulation of dismiss does not apply to dft NJoy, Inc. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 10/29/18.(KJR)cc: COR
|April 18, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: DENYING dft The H.T. Hackney Co.'s 40 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 4/18/18.(KJR)cc: COR
|November 15, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) GRANTING dfts' Logic, Spark, R.J. Reynolds & Fontem's 18 19 20 & 34 MOTIONS for Joinder of dft Swisher's Motion to Dismiss; (2) GRANTING Swisher's 12 MOTION to Dismiss for failure t o state a claim; (3) all claims against Swisher International, Inc., Logic Technology Development LLC, Spark Industries LLC, R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company & Fontem Ventures B.V. are DISMISSED; (4) plas request for oral argument is DENIED. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 11/15/17.(KJR)cc: COR
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?