Norton et al v. Toothman et al
| Thomas Norton, George Norton, Carl Norton, Clyde Wilcoxson, Gess Family Partnership, Ltd, Troy Thompson, Larry White, Brenda White, Patsy A. Bratton, Mary Louis Bratton Quertermous, Wayne Quertermous, Irene Gerdeman and Jane Graves Blackford |
| Stephanie Toothman, Ryan Zinke, USA Department of the Interior and National Park Service |
| 5:2017cv00351 |
| August 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Fayette |
| Danny C. Reeves |
| Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
JUDGMENT: 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants; 2. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and is STRICKEN from the Court's active docket; 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE ORDER and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 9/30/2021.(KM)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions at DE 34 and 35 are hereby DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew A. Stinnett on 5/15/19.(JLM)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) 12 MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 2) Petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED with prejudice. All other allegations contained in Count I, Count II, Count IV, and Count V remain pending. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/15/2018.(SCD)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
