Bowles et al v. Kentucky et al
| T.B.B., N.H.S.B., C.D.B., M.W.B. and B.W. |
| Bourbon County Kentucky, Gary Wilson, Sheila Gant, Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., Matthew P. Johnston, ARNP, Trena Preston, Kelly Cox-Lynn, LPN, Harry Laytart, Amie Kearns, Justin Hughes, Brittany Sidney and Sonja French |
| 5:2017cv00434 |
| October 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Bourbon |
| Karen K. Caldwell |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
OPINION & ORDER: 1) The 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against the ACH Dfts are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 2) Dft's 63 Motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 3) Dft's 64 Motion to exclude IS DENIED as MOOT; 4) A separate Judgment will be entered contemporaneously with this Opinion and Order; and 5) This matter shall be STRICKEN from the Court's active docket. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 11/30/2020. (MDC) cc: COR
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: matter is STAYED with respect to Plaintiffs claims against Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., Matthew P. Johnson, ARNP, Trena Preston, ARNP, and Kelly Cox-Lynn, LPN. The parties should promptly inform the Court of the decision by the Kentucky SupremeCourt on the constitutionality of the Medical Review Panel Act. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 5/10/18.(KJR)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
