Sharp v. EMHFL, Inc.
Plaintiff: Mary Elizabeth Sharp
Defendant: EMHFL, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2017cv00503
Filed: December 21, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: Lincoln
Presiding Judge: Joseph M. Hood
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: IT IS ORDERED: 1. that Defendant's 8 Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's claims Inc is GRANTED; 2. that Defendant shall have 14 days from entry of this Order to file its Answer to Plaintiff's claim. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 9/28/2018.(KM)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sharp v. EMHFL, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Elizabeth Sharp
Represented By: Andrew Dutkanych, III
Represented By: Mauricus R. Lofton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EMHFL, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?