Kamps, Inc. et al v. Mustang Aviation, Inc.
| Kamps, Inc., Kamps Air, Inc. and Kamps Air, LLC |
| Mustang Aviation, Inc. |
| 5:2018cv00430 |
| June 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Fayette |
| Robert E Wier |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Susan Pope. #1 Complaint, has been filed by Kamps, Inc. & Kamps Air, Inc. without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (KJR) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Mustang Aviation, Inc.; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically. (KJR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4109591), filed by Kamps, Inc., Kamps Air, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Work Sheet Form, #2 Exhibit 2 - Completed Work Sheet, #3 Exhibit 3 - Pre-Purchase Examination Report, #4 Exhibit 4 - Invoice, #5 Exhibit 5 - Check List, #6 Exhibit 6 - Letter from S. Whonsetler, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Summons)(KJR) |
| Conflict Check run. (KJR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
