Dean v. Quintana
Glenn R. Dean |
Francisco Quintana |
5:2018cv00487 |
August 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Lexington Office |
Fayette |
Karen K Caldwell |
P SO |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 USCA Case Number 18-6022 Case Manager Jennifer Earl for #10 Notice of Appeal, filed by Glenn R. Dean, pro se. (GLD) |
|
Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #6 Judgment denying habeas corpus petition & #9 Order denying Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment by Glenn R. Dean, pro se. cc: COR, 6CCA,pro se pltf w/ docket sheet via US Mail. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Mailing Envelope post marked 9/21/18)(JJ) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Karen K. Caldwell for review: #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Glenn R. Dean, pro se - No filing fee received. (JJ) |
|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by Glenn R. Dean (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope post marked 9/10/18)(JJ) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Alter Judgment by Glenn R. Dean, pro se, as to #6 Judgment, Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit District Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, #2 Exhibit Dicstrict Court's Judgment, #3 Cover Letter, #4 Mailing Envelope post marked 9/5/18)(JJ) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: re #7 MOTION to Alter Judgment by Glenn R. Dean, pro se, as to #6 Judgment, (JJ) |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT: 1. Dean's petition for a writ of habeas corpus #1 is DENIED. 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN for the Court's docket. 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 8/17/2018.(JJ)cc: COR, pro se petitioner via us mail. Modified text on 8/17/2018 (JJ). |
|
Filing 4 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(KJR) |
Filing 2 Filing fee received - $ 5.00, receipt number 5025979 (KJR) |
Conflict Check run. (KJR) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Filing Fee Received (KJR) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Glenn R. Dean (pro se). (Attachments: #1 cover ltr, #2 env postmarked 8/6/18)(KJR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dean v. Quintana | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Francisco Quintana | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Glenn R. Dean | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.