Griffith v. Secura Supreme Insurance Company
| Darrell Griffith |
| Secura Supreme Insurance Company |
| 5:2018cv00499 |
| August 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Fayette |
| Gregory F VanTatenhove |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove for review: #6 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (KM) |
| Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Brown, Ashley) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove for review: #5 Order for Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - Joint Status Report not filed. (KM) |
Filing 5
ORDER FOR REPORT OF PARTIES' PLANNING MEETING: 1. NLT 30 days from the date of entry of this order, counsel for the parties shall conduct meeting required by Rule 26(f); 2. At the time of the meeting, counsel shall exchange the disclosures required & in the future shall make supplemental disclosures when required; 3. NLT 10 days after the meeting, counsel for the parties shall file a written joint report. This report shall conform to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Appendix Form 52, and shall include the following information listed herein the Order; 4. The parties are directed to advise the Court at the time of the submission of the parties joint report of all parent corporations, subsidiaries, affiliates, members and/or partners with which it is associated. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 8/27/2018. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form)(KM)cc: COR
|
| Filing 4 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Secura Supreme Insurance Company. (KM) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Ashley K. Brown, Graham D. Barth on behalf of Secura Supreme Insurance Company (KM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Garrard Circuit Court, case number 18-CI-154. ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4147528), filed by Secura Supreme Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KM) |
| ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Secura Supreme Insurance Company (Filed at Docket Entry #1 as part of the State Court Record). (KM) |
| Conflict Check run. (KM) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove for review: Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal) (KM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Griffith v. Secura Supreme Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Darrell Griffith | |
| Represented By: | Jarrod O. Bentley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Secura Supreme Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Graham D. Barth |
| Represented By: | Ashley K. Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
