K.G. et al v. Woodford County Board of Education et al
M.G. and K.G. |
Woodford County Board of Education and J.C.S. |
5:2018cv00555 |
October 2, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Joseph M Hood |
Civil Rights: Education |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER: 1) w/in 21 days, parties shall meet to discuss nature and basis of claims and defenses and possibilities for prompt settlement ore resolution of case, to make or arrange for FRCP 26(a)(1) disclosures and to develop proposed discovery plan; 2) w/in 10 days after meeting, parties file joint status report. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 11/15/2018.(STC)cc: COR |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Woodford County Board of Education.(Chenoweth, Grant) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to J.C.S.(In his Official Capacity), J.C.S.(Inidividually), Woodford County Board of Education; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically for service. (STC) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING by K.G., M.G. re #1 Complaint Summons to Be Executed (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Mazaheri, Christina) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED). ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4181960), filed by M.G., K.G. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A: Transcript of Recordings, #3 Exhibit B: Case Study Overview).(JML) |
Conflict Check run. (JML) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.