Rogers v. Zo Skin Health, Inc.
| Leslie Rogers |
| Zo Skin Health, Inc. |
| 5:2018cv00587 |
| October 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Joseph M Hood |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: 1) Within 21 days parties shall meet to discuss the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution to this case. 2) Within 10 days after that meeting parties shall file a joint status report. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 11/26/2018.(JJ)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Court's 11/7/18 #5 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 11/26/2018.(JJ)cc: COR
|
| NOTICE OF DOCKET MODIFICATION TO Jennifer Hagerman re #6 Response to Order to Show Cause; Error: Exhibits were filed together with the motion instead of as separate attachments. Entry by attorney; Clerk added the exhibits as separate attachments. In the future, file each exhibit separately from one another and separate from the main document. No further action required by counsel. cc: COR (JJ) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Zo Skin Health, Inc. #5 filed by Zo Skin Health, Inc.. (Hageman, Jennifer) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/26/2018: #1 Exhibit Declaration in Support) (JJ). |
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall SHOW CAUSE within 14 days of entry of this order why this matter should not be remanded to Fayette Circuit Court. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 11/7/2018.(KM)cc: COR, Attorney Massey via U.S. mail
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Joseph M. Hood for review: #4 Answer to Complaint, #1 Notice of Removal (JJ) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Zo Skin Health, Inc..(Hageman, Jennifer) |
| Clerk's Note: Notice was sent in error and the entry has been deleted. (JLM) |
| Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Zo Skin Health, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Rohto Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. for Zo Skin Health, Inc. (JLM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fayette County Circuit Court, Kentucky, case number 18-CI-3310. ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4199079), filed by Zo Skin Health, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record Exhibit 1)(JLM) |
| Conflict Check run. (JLM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rogers v. Zo Skin Health, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Leslie Rogers | |
| Represented By: | Mark K. Gray |
| Represented By: | Terrance L. Massey, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Matthew L. White |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Zo Skin Health, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Hageman |
| Represented By: | Thomas McIntosh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
