Hutsell v. USA
Charles Edward Hutsell |
USA |
5:2018cv00644 |
December 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
P SO |
Robert E Wier |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 USCA Case Number 19-5023 Case Manager Briston Mitchell for #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Charles Edward Hutsell. (Attachments: #1 USCA Caption)(STC) |
Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Charles Edward Hutsell re #4 Order Dismissing Case,, #5 Judgment, (STC) |
Filing 7 USCA Case Number 19-5023 Case Manager Briston S. Mitchell for #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Charles Edward Hutsell. (KM) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #5 Judgment, by Charles Edward Hutsell, pro se. (NO FILING FEE RECEIVED). cc: COR, 6CCA (Attachments: #1 envelope postmarked 12-26-18)(GLD) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: #6 Notice of Appeal - no filing fee received. (GLD) |
Filing 5 JUDGMENT: (1) ENTERS JUDGMENT in favor of Respondent; (2) DISMISSES Hutsell's petition #1 WITHOUT PREJUDICE; (3) DENIES issuance of a certificate of appealability; and (4) STRIKES this matter from the Court's active docket. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment, and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 12/17/2018.(STC)cc: Petitioner |
Filing 4 ORDER: Court SUMMARILY DISMISSES #1 WITHOUT PREJUDICE and STRIKES this matter from the active docket. The Clerk shall serve on the Kentucky Attorney General a copy of this Order and the underlying petition. Additionally, the Clerk listed Hutsell's address as at Elkton FCI. The BOP's online inmate locator, however, lists Hutsell as currently housed at FCI McKean. Accordingly, in addition to sending a copy of this Order to Hutsell's address of record, the Clerk SHALL also mail a copy of this Order to Charles E. Hutsell, 13378-032, FCI McKean. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 12/17/2018.(STC)cc: KYAG,Petitioner |
Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(JLM) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Charles Edward Hutsell, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Envelope not postmarked) No Filing Fee or IFP Motion Received. (JLM) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (JLM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hutsell v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Charles Edward Hutsell | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.