Latham v. Matrix Absence Management, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Latham
Defendant: Tiffany & Company Income Protection Plan, Matrix Absence Management, Inc. and Tiffany and Company Jewelers, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2019cv00017
Filed: January 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Gregory F VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2019 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove for review: re #11 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation FOR ADDITIONAL EXTENSION by Matrix Absence Management, Inc., Tiffany & Company Income Protection Plan, Tiffany and Company Jewelers, Inc. (JJ)
March 8, 2019 Filing 11 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation FOR ADDITIONAL EXTENSION by Matrix Absence Management, Inc., Tiffany & Company Income Protection Plan, Tiffany and Company Jewelers, Inc.. (Inman, J.)
February 25, 2019 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge VanTatenhove for review: re #10 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation FOR ADDITIONAL LIMITED EXTENSION FOR SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS by Matrix Absence Management, Inc., Tiffany & Company Income Protection Plan, Tiffany and Company Jewelers, Inc. (KJR)
February 24, 2019 Filing 10 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation FOR ADDITIONAL LIMITED EXTENSION FOR SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS by Matrix Absence Management, Inc., Tiffany & Company Income Protection Plan, Tiffany and Company Jewelers, Inc.. (Inman, J.)
February 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: 1. Joint #8 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MAKE RESPONSIVE FILING is GRANTED. 2. Defendants shall have up to and including 2/24/2019, by which to respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 2/22/2019.(JJ)cc: COR
February 15, 2019 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove for review: re #8 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MAKE RESPONSIVE FILING by Matrix Absence Management, Inc., Tiffany & Company Income Protection Plan, Tiffany and Company Jewelers, Inc. (JJ)
February 14, 2019 Filing 8 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MAKE RESPONSIVE FILING by Matrix Absence Management, Inc., Tiffany & Company Income Protection Plan, Tiffany and Company Jewelers, Inc.. (Inman, J.)
February 4, 2019 Filing 7 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tiffany & Company Income Protection Plan, Tiffany and Company Jewelers, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Tiffany & Co. for Tiffany & Company Income Protection Plan, Tiffany and Company Jewelers, Inc... (Inman, J.)
February 3, 2019 Filing 6 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Matrix Absence Management, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Delphi Financial Group, Inc., Corporate Parent Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc. for Matrix Absence Management, Inc... (Inman, J.)
January 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER, re #4 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MAKE RESPONSIVE FILING: 1. The Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint #4 is GRANTED; and 2. The Defendants shall have up to and including February 14, 2019, by which to respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 1/28/2019.(STC)cc: COR
January 24, 2019 Filing 4 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MAKE RESPONSIVE FILING by Matrix Absence Management, Inc., Tiffany & Company Income Protection Plan, Tiffany and Company Jewelers, Inc.. (Inman, J.)
January 24, 2019 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove for review: re #4 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MAKE RESPONSIVE FILING by Matrix Absence Management, Inc., Tiffany & Company Income Protection Plan, Tiffany and Company Jewelers, Inc. (JJ)
January 18, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, J. Andrew Inman. #1 Notice of Removal, has been filed by Matrix Absence Management, Inc. and Tiffany and Company Jewelers, Inc. without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (JJ)
January 17, 2019 Conflict Check run. (JJ)
January 16, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Bourbon Co.Circuit Court, case number 18-CI-00271. ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4262739), filed by Tiffany and Company Jewelers, Inc., Tiffany & Company Income Protection Plan, Matrix Absence Management, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(JJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Latham v. Matrix Absence Management, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tiffany & Company Income Protection Plan
Represented By: James Michael Inman
Represented By: J. Andrew Inman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matrix Absence Management, Inc.
Represented By: James Michael Inman
Represented By: J. Andrew Inman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tiffany and Company Jewelers, Inc.
Represented By: James Michael Inman
Represented By: J. Andrew Inman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Latham
Represented By: Erik David Peterson
Represented By: Elizabeth Ann Thornsbury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?