Peichoto v. Speedway, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Autumn Peichoto
Defendant: Speedway, LLC and Speedway Superamerica LLC
Case Number: 5:2019cv00058
Filed: February 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Robert E Wier
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE OF FILING by Speedway Superamerica LLC, Speedway, LLC re #9 Response in Opposition to Motion, to Remand (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Palmer, Andrew)
March 29, 2019 Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Autumn Peichoto filed by Speedway, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Tanner Shultz email re charges, #2 Exhibit Tanner Shultz email re medical expenses, #3 Exhibit Unpublished cases)(Palmer, Andrew) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/1/2019: #4 Proposed Order) (JJ).
March 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 AGREED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant is granted an extension of time though 3/29/2019 to respond to Plaintiff's #6 Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 3/21/2019. (JJ)cc: COR
March 21, 2019 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Robert E. Wier for review: re #7 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation extending time for defendant to respond to plaintiff's motion to remand by Speedway, LLC (JJ)
March 20, 2019 Filing 7 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation extending time for defendant to respond to plaintiff's motion to remand by Speedway, LLC. (Palmer, Andrew)
March 7, 2019 NOTICE OF DOCKET MODIFICATION and NOTICE re DOCUMENT CONVERSION REQUIREMENT TO Tanner Schultz re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Autumn Peichoto ; Error 1: the document was scanned instead of converted into PDF format directly from the native word application. Use a scanner ONLY when you cannot electronically prepare your documents with word processing software and convert them to PDF format. No further action required by counsel as to Error 1. Error 2: attachments were insufficiently described as "Exhibit," "Exhibit." Correction: Clerk renamed the attachments. Attachments must be adequately described. Ex: Exhibit A (incorrect); Exhibit A Affidavit of John Doe (correct). No further action required as to Error 2. Error 3: Pages 4 of "Exhibit" was sideways; Entry by attorney; Correction: Clerk rotated the page and entered the document as a separate attachment; At the browse screen within ECF, always open and view each PDF document before proceeding with the filing. No further action required as to Error 3. cc: COR (JJ)
March 6, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Autumn Peichoto (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Proposed Order)(Shultz, Tanner) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/7/2019: #5 Exhibit Corrected Letter) (JJ).
March 6, 2019 Filing 5 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Palmer, Andrew)
February 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: 1. Within 21 days parties shall meet to consider the topics Rule 21(f)(2) mandates. 2. Within 14 days of the meeting parties shall file a joint status report. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 2/20/2019.(JJ)cc: COR
February 20, 2019 Filing 2 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Speedway, LLC identifying Corporate Parent MPC Investment LLC, Corporate Parent Marathon Petroleum Corporation for Speedway, LLC. Speedway Superamerica LLC is the former registered name of Speedway LLC. Speedway America, LLC no longer exists as a registeredentity and is not a proper party to this action. Speedway LLC is the correct party. (KJR)
February 20, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fayette Circuit Court, case number 19-CI-202. ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4290554), filed by Speedway Superamerica LLC, Speedway, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record w/Answer, #2 email from Tanner Shultz, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(KJR)
February 20, 2019 ANSWER to Complaint by Speedway Superamerica LLC, Speedway, LLC. (attached to the State Court Record at DE #1 ) (KJR)
February 20, 2019 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Robert E. Wier for review: Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal), #1 Notice of Removal, (KJR)
February 20, 2019 Conflict Check run. (KJR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peichoto v. Speedway, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Speedway, LLC
Represented By: D. Christopher Robinson
Represented By: Andrew M. Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Speedway Superamerica LLC
Represented By: D. Christopher Robinson
Represented By: Andrew M. Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Autumn Peichoto
Represented By: Tanner H. Shultz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?